Why libertarianism gets such a terrible rep, part N

On one hand, we have an acknowledgment and criticism of regulatory capture.  On the other, we have someone calling token criticism of a business that engages in it (a foreign owned one, at that) “UnAmerican”.  Which one is closer to what casual observers imagine when they hear “libertarian”?

Share
This entry was posted in philosophy/life, random shots. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why libertarianism gets such a terrible rep, part N

  1. This is a serious matter. Somehow, (we) libertarians have to reclaim the term from the likes of Paul, Barr and the Donderos of the world. This kind of thing makes a mockery of libertarians, and a mockery of the very word. “Libertarian” ought not mean “less dickishly statist than all those other bastards”, but something positive that people can connect with. Ugh!!!

    (wtf? now I have to make an elephant stand up to comment? okay… :D )

  2. b psycho says:

    Tweaked Spam Karma, trying to stop the drive-bys. Seems to be working so far. Odd that it’s fucking with you though, since you have previous comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


× one = 5

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>