<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Psychopolitik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psychopolitik.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com</link>
	<description>Random thoughts from a big, angry negro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality Control by ricketson</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/02/18/quality-control/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>ricketson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2044#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Really Tyler? Really?

Anyway, the other issue with the ultrasound requirement is that it adds another step to a time-sensitive procedure. If you look at the politics behind the requirement, it is clearly just one of many obstacles that would be placed in front of a woman seeking an abortion, with the intent of making the process so costly, uncomfortable, and time-consuming that some women will fail to go through with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Tyler? Really?</p>
<p>Anyway, the other issue with the ultrasound requirement is that it adds another step to a time-sensitive procedure. If you look at the politics behind the requirement, it is clearly just one of many obstacles that would be placed in front of a woman seeking an abortion, with the intent of making the process so costly, uncomfortable, and time-consuming that some women will fail to go through with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Steve&#8217;s Time Machine, nobody rides clean by Chinese flexibility and union rules &#171; Phil Ebersole&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/22/slogging-for-apples/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese flexibility and union rules &#171; Phil Ebersole&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2028#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>[...] on In Steve&#8217;s Time Machine, nobody rides clean for a good post on the left-libertarian Psychopolitik web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on In Steve&#8217;s Time Machine, nobody rides clean for a good post on the left-libertarian Psychopolitik web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Steve&#8217;s Time Machine, nobody rides clean by B Psycho</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/22/slogging-for-apples/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>B Psycho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2028#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>I was wondering about that because they stated it as more than HS but not to a Bachelor&#039;s degree, yet Associate degrees exist.  The specific industrial/trade designation makes sense in context, guess it was just bad wording.

With fewer of those kinds of jobs around anyway, the complaint about not having enough people trained in them is quite the &quot;well duh!&quot; moment: if students have an eye to the job market when they register, they&#039;re going to be discouraged from fields that &lt;em&gt;have a bad job market.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering about that because they stated it as more than HS but not to a Bachelor&#8217;s degree, yet Associate degrees exist.  The specific industrial/trade designation makes sense in context, guess it was just bad wording.</p>
<p>With fewer of those kinds of jobs around anyway, the complaint about not having enough people trained in them is quite the &#8220;well duh!&#8221; moment: if students have an eye to the job market when they register, they&#8217;re going to be discouraged from fields that <em>have a bad job market.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Steve&#8217;s Time Machine, nobody rides clean by ricketson</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/22/slogging-for-apples/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>ricketson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2028#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mid-level skills&quot; question: serious or rhetorical?

Assuming it&#039;s serious, they mean things like carpentry and electrical work, or welding and other things used by heavy industry. Trade school; tech school. Of course there&#039;s a reason that not many Americans have those skills anymore -- the people who had those skills all lost their jobs 40 years ago.

BTW, I have a post on my blog that sorta responds to this post:
http://e-vigilance.blogspot.com/2012/01/american-patents-chinese-slavery.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mid-level skills&#8221; question: serious or rhetorical?</p>
<p>Assuming it&#8217;s serious, they mean things like carpentry and electrical work, or welding and other things used by heavy industry. Trade school; tech school. Of course there&#8217;s a reason that not many Americans have those skills anymore &#8212; the people who had those skills all lost their jobs 40 years ago.</p>
<p>BTW, I have a post on my blog that sorta responds to this post:<br />
<a href="http://e-vigilance.blogspot.com/2012/01/american-patents-chinese-slavery.html" rel="nofollow">http://e-vigilance.blogspot.com/2012/01/american-patents-chinese-slavery.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Premature Legislation by B Psycho</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/18/premature-legislation/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>B Psycho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2026#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>Who?

Seriously though, considering he somehow posted the &lt;em&gt;second&lt;/em&gt; that I did, I&#039;m leaning towards &quot;no&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who?</p>
<p>Seriously though, considering he somehow posted the <em>second</em> that I did, I&#8217;m leaning towards &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Premature Legislation by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/18/premature-legislation/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2026#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>I just have one question: Is Alan for real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have one question: Is Alan for real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Say &#8216;inevitable&#8217; in the mirror 5 times and he appears&#8221; by dL</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/12/inevitability/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>dL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2020#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Metta World Peace still spells Ron Artest without a jump shot. Mitt Romney spells Jeb Bush 2016.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metta World Peace still spells Ron Artest without a jump shot. Mitt Romney spells Jeb Bush 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Cuz I Said So&#8221; theory of global relations by dL</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/04/kevin-drum-and-iran/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>dL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2009#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>Kevin Drum does more to de-legitimize &quot;social democracy&quot; than a libertarian could ever hope to.  If you are going to equate Paul with David Duke and the Nazi Party, then I would suggest you better have a better candidate in the rabbits hat to pull out as an immediate alternative; otherwise, it sounds like you are defending a system where the only plausible voting challenge to the status quo is David Duke and the Nazis. That is, the Nazis are the only guys that can&#039;t be bought off or the Nazis are the most effective of the bunch that have not been bought off.

When you demonize your opponent and claim a better alternative, you should   produce the alternative.  Otherwise you end up inadvertently making the case against your position in direct proportion to the degree you demonize the opposition. 

The problem with Drum is that he has also previously marginalized figures on &quot;the left,&quot; such as Nader, Kucinich, Gravel. There&#039;s nothing to pull out from the magician&#039;s hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Drum does more to de-legitimize &#8220;social democracy&#8221; than a libertarian could ever hope to.  If you are going to equate Paul with David Duke and the Nazi Party, then I would suggest you better have a better candidate in the rabbits hat to pull out as an immediate alternative; otherwise, it sounds like you are defending a system where the only plausible voting challenge to the status quo is David Duke and the Nazis. That is, the Nazis are the only guys that can&#8217;t be bought off or the Nazis are the most effective of the bunch that have not been bought off.</p>
<p>When you demonize your opponent and claim a better alternative, you should   produce the alternative.  Otherwise you end up inadvertently making the case against your position in direct proportion to the degree you demonize the opposition. </p>
<p>The problem with Drum is that he has also previously marginalized figures on &#8220;the left,&#8221; such as Nader, Kucinich, Gravel. There&#8217;s nothing to pull out from the magician&#8217;s hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Say &#8216;inevitable&#8217; in the mirror 5 times and he appears&#8221; by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/12/inevitability/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2020#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>Well, since Romney&#039;s about as close as your gonna get to a living, breathing automaton, it makes sense.  I&#039;ve heard people say, &quot;I like [insert non-mainstream candidate here], but he&#039;s too radical.&quot;  So I guess since everybody else is limiting their choices to Burger King or McDonald&#039;s, you have to, too.  Yet another reason that voting is a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since Romney&#8217;s about as close as your gonna get to a living, breathing automaton, it makes sense.  I&#8217;ve heard people say, &#8220;I like [insert non-mainstream candidate here], but he&#8217;s too radical.&#8221;  So I guess since everybody else is limiting their choices to Burger King or McDonald&#8217;s, you have to, too.  Yet another reason that voting is a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spreading it thin by Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.psychopolitik.com/2012/01/07/spreading-it-thin/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychopolitik.com/?p=2014#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Another thought provoking post I see--Thanks for sharing! Essentially this is one of the main issues my fellow Republicans seem to grapple with, fully understanding that life isn&#039;t &quot;our way, or the high way&quot; so to speak. Coming off a boost of sorts following his favorable finish in Iowa, this would have been an ideal time for Santorum to exhibit an open mind and build his base accordingly (not so much in a calculating sense, but understanding that pursuing the top job as a representive of the people that alone means all the people).  Have to respect him though for his right to his own opinion, which, however, may sink his chances to be representative of all the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought provoking post I see&#8211;Thanks for sharing! Essentially this is one of the main issues my fellow Republicans seem to grapple with, fully understanding that life isn&#8217;t &#8220;our way, or the high way&#8221; so to speak. Coming off a boost of sorts following his favorable finish in Iowa, this would have been an ideal time for Santorum to exhibit an open mind and build his base accordingly (not so much in a calculating sense, but understanding that pursuing the top job as a representive of the people that alone means all the people).  Have to respect him though for his right to his own opinion, which, however, may sink his chances to be representative of all the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

